My friend and I started a neighborhood book club to study and learn more about freedom. Last night was our first meeting and we discussed an address given to Harvard students by an exiled Russian named "Alexander Solzhenitsyn". The title is
A World Split Apart. It was a hard, but very thought-provoking read.
Is it true that we measure the world by a "Western yardstick" and see other countries as successful depending on how close the come to being like ours?
The author if this article has lived in a communistic society and thinks socialism leads to a "total destruction of the human spirit and to a leveling of mankind into death". However, he does not seem pleased with our free structure either.
He sees our society as living by the "letter of the law". We seem to ask ourselves if something is legal instead of if it is moral. People think "if one is right from a legal point of view, nothing more is required". He thinks we live in an atmosphere of "moral mediocrity", "paralyzing man's noblest impulses".
He mentions some of our societies evils like "motion pictures full of pornography, crime and horror" which are supposed to be balanced by a young person's right to view them or not to view them. He thinks this way of life has "shown it's inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil".
He gives the example of our capital being without electricity for a couple of hours and "all of a sudden crowds of American citizens start looting and creating havoc... the social system [must be] quite unstable and unhealthy.
He also mentions the press is also living by this "letter of the law". They feel no moral responsibility as long as they don't infringe on legality. He thinks our media is not really competing as we theoretically claim, but they seem to be quite unified because they emphasize those "opinions which do not too openly contradict their own and the general trend".
There's so much more, and all these ideas made me wonder - should our government do more to protect against evil?
I don't know.
I think our founding fathers made our constitution in order to allow as much human freedom as possible (laws were made so that one person's freedom didn't infringe on someone else's). A society like this allows for the ultimate in human joy, inspiration and achievement.
I've been reading about societies in which there was very little individual freedom and things were done for the good of the state. It seems to me that these people became sort of numb in feeling. They had to give up their individual feelings for the good of the state. When I give something up for the good of another
voluntarily, I am filled with joy and peace. However, if I am
made to do so - I have to suppress my feelings of injustice. I imagine that if one does this often enough - one begins to feel numb inside.
We live in a country where we have a choice to be voluntarily good. This is why we can have so much joy and happiness. However, in order for this to work, there must also be the availability of a choice to do evil which ultimately brings misery.
I think that is why this man, and others, look around our society, see so much spiritual decline, and do not want this for their country.
We have confused our "pursuit of happiness" for our pursuit for "material things". This ultimately does lead to spiritual decline and misery.
He said, "Only voluntary, inspired self-restraint can raise man above the world stream of materialism". How do we get this "voluntary self-restraint"?
It seems to me that as we began to see people choosing evil, we asked our government to step in and make more laws to prevent them from doing so. This is what led to people always looking to the law to see if something was right or not - or a "letter of the law" society. Unfortunately (or fortunately?), we can not make laws fast enough to prevent all of the evil that could exist, but we keep trying, which is what is leading us more and more to a socialistic type of government. We are giving up our freedom and asking the government to step in and take over.
Someone at book club mentioned how the media is putting evil and illegal things on screen and glorifying them, and how we, as a people, should take a stand and say that such actions are wrong because they are hurting the welfare of our society. I agree with him, but
how? Do we make
more laws to prevent this evil? It seems like this just keeps leading us down the wrong path of diminished freedom, but if that is the path we are heading towards anyway - shouldn't we do our best to make it as clean as possible? It seems that way.
That is why my answer to the question above, "Should the government do more to protect against evil?" was a definite, "?".
It seems to me that the real and and best way to fight against this corrosion of our society is to strengthen families and share the gospel. Strong families make strong individuals and strong statesmen. Strong families will make virtuous people.
Don't get me wrong, I think it is crucial that we keep fighting for good laws (especially those that strengthen the family and against those that weaken it), but laws do not do much to strengthen an individual's desire to choose good. Those lessons are learned in families.
We have gotten so comfortable in our society that we have lost sight of those things that really matter. Since many are choosing to focus on the temporary and fleeting, we might just have to be compelled through wars, calamities, etc. to remember what is real and what is fluff.
Sorry for the grim post. It's what was on my mind this morning.